Loading
SynthCounsel is architected as a scrivener — it takes your content and formats it into court-compliant documents. It does not give legal advice, and it does not choose filings for you. Here's exactly how that boundary is enforced in the product.
UPL compliance is not a disclaimer — it is an architectural constraint wired into every layer of the product.
The guided document wizard never auto-selects a document. When you describe your situation, the wizard returns a list of documents that pro se parties in similar situations commonly use, each with the rule citation. You pick which (if any) to generate. We do not rank them, recommend one, or hide the others.
Counsel (the AI assistant) is required by system prompt to cite rules via tool calls before asserting any procedural requirement. It may not estimate deadlines from memory — it must call the deadline calculator. Word limits, caption formats, and rule text are all pulled from a canonical rules database, not generated by the model.
Counsel's system prompt includes a hard rule: it may not recommend which document to file, which defense to assert, which argument to make, or which party to sue. When asked "what should I do?", it lists the options under the applicable rules and describes when each is typically used. It does not pick.
Product copy uses scrivener-compliant phrasing: "Pro se defendants filing in cases like this typically use..." / "Documents available for your situation..." / "Under [rule], the options are...". You will not see "we recommend" in the context of filings, defenses, or strategy.
Deadlines computed by the core engine include a 3-business-day safety buffer. Ambiguous rules resolve to the shorter/earlier deadline. Every computed deadline carries a trace showing the rule, the triggering event, and the buffer — so you can verify the math.
Every generated document footer includes the rule data version, the app version, and the timestamp. If a rule changes after you generate a document, you can see exactly which version you used. Rule data older than 12 months triggers a staleness warning.
In 2023, Upsolve — a non-profit that helped consumers file Chapter 7 bankruptcy for free — was enjoined in New York on unauthorized-practice-of-law grounds. The core issue was not whether Upsolve was helpful (it was). The issue was that an online tool was making decisions that, under state law, only a licensed attorney can make.
The lesson for any legal-tech product is blunt: the moment software decides for the user — picks the defense, picks the motion, picks the argument — it stops being a scrivener and starts being a law firm. That is UPL, and in most states it is a crime.
SynthCounsel is built so that no software component can make that kind of decision. The wizard shows options. The AI cites rules and lists choices. The deadline engine computes dates but does not tell you whether to file. You — the user — make every substantive decision. We format it into something the court will accept.
This is also why we encourage users facing serious or high-stakes legal situations to consult a licensed attorney. SynthCounsel is a tool that makes the mechanical side of litigation faster and more accurate. It does not replace legal judgment, and it is not trying to.
The scrivener disclaimer appears in six places in the product. This is by design — not because we think users need to be told twice, but because a single point of failure is not acceptable on something this important.
SynthCounsel is general legal information, not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by using the product. For advice specific to your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. See also: Security posture · Terms of Service · Privacy Policy.